Quoting Cyrille:

Quote:
Yes you can change your vote. You must go to database, click on "All pending updates", search the profile, click on "Evaluate" and redo as the first time.

I meant the new reputation rating system, not the contribution voting.. 

Quoting Vega:

Quote:
I meant the new reputation rating system, not the contribution voting.. 

Ah sorry don't understand your sentence  Yes I think Ken has said we have 3 days to change a vote, or maybe it was to edit a post... didn't really remember.
Ken has added in the FAQ (link) an entry for the reputation system but not with a lot of details about it. He has said in the post of the announcement forum that's to avoid people to find a fault to counter the system.
As already said, abuse of the negative vote will be sanctionned by the admins and it's normal!

Quoting pdf256:

Quote:
Quoting pdf256:

Quote:
Quoting mwkirchner:

Quote:
Quoting Unicus69:

Quote:
As this is a very subjective area, our votes are only a reccomendation.  The screener has the final say as to whether or not the improvement is significant enough to be accepted.

Well ... I can tell you this ...

The POTC only had the pre-release cover for front & back in the databaase.

There were numerous contributions for the correct front & rear covers ... BUT ... mine was the ONLY ONE that actually contained the slip cover that the DVD came in ...

That is why I am confused.

As for the Superbad one ... only Ray Charles would not have seen how much difference there was from mine to the one in the database.

This is what makes it so discouraging about trying to improve the database on here ...   

Mark,

At the time you submitted both of these, my scans were ahead of you. Both of my scans got approved. Your Superbad front is not as sharp as mine, which is now the current scan. Your POC scans look very red/pink to me ( you think that mine are too yellow ).

My guess is that once my scans were approved, yours were not a 'significant improvement'.

By the way, the votes on mine were 10-0 and 17-0.

pdf

So let me get this right. Mark is unhappy because his scans that he submitted after mine (both of which he voted yes on) were declined after mine were approved. I try to add some background info and then I get a 'bad' vote for it? If I had called Mark a jerk or something then I could understand. But to get a bad vote for adding info to the thread is something that has me very confused.    

pdf

pdf256 ... if you did indeed get a bad vote in the reputation ... then that was definately uncalled for. I took no offense whatsoever for what you added to this topic. It helped explain to me why mine got declined. I do not know who would have done that ... but they can ... and should ... retract it.

Mark