| Author |
Message |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 5,635 |
| | Posted: | | | | Unlike the Yardbirds, Tenacious D has had a steady lineup of members. Using the band name makes good sense. | | | If it wasn't for bad taste, I wouldn't have no taste at all.
Cliff |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 |  Posts: 742 |
| | Posted: | | | | Keeping the line up steady isn't too hard in case of Tenacious D  | | | | Lutz |
|
| Registered: June 8, 2007 |  Posts: 58 |
| | Posted: | | | | Same question, different example: On Kill Bill 2 the credits show that the character "The Bride" was originally created by Q&U. Quentin Tarantino and Uma Thurman in this case. I would opt to include both full names under "Original Characters By" and use "Q&U" in the "Credited As" field. |
|
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 5,917 |
| | Posted: | | | | Toughie! I would go with listing individual names unless "Q&U" is a known group of some sort. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 2,372 |
| | Posted: | | | | same answer. one credit. you can't take one credit and split it into two simply because you know who was involved in the group. At least not for the master database.  |
|
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 5,917 |
| |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Italo Disco: Quote:
Same question, different example: On Kill Bill 2 the credits show that the character "The Bride" was originally created by Q&U. Quentin Tarantino and Uma Thurman in this case. I would opt to include both full names under "Original Characters By" and use "Q&U" in the "Credited As" field. You provided your own answer, Italo. Thgat is YOUR preference and NOT what the Rules tell you to do, personal preference ALWAYS is an issue for your local and NOT for the Online. Same answer for you, Doc. Though Italo's answer would be an option, that falls within the Rules, but remember DOCUMENTATION...ALWAYS!!! Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video | | | | Last edited: by Winston Smith |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 |  Posts: 519 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting lyonsden5: Quote:
same answer. one credit.
you can't take one credit and split it into two simply because you know who was involved in the group. At least not for the master database. you've got to be kidding me. ken has given us this fantastic credtied as feature and you don't think we should use it bevause there's a "&" in between the alias names. what if the credit was "Quentin Tarantino & Uma Thurman" I bet you would separate them then. what's the difference. | | | | Stuart |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | Stuart: No he's not kidding you and neither am I, do you see ONE credit ON Screen or TWO, on a BAD night I might see TWO.  But there is ONLY one, this one becomes a LOCAL issue. Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 2,372 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Gadgeteer: Quote:
Quoting lyonsden5:Quote:
same answer. one credit.
you can't take one credit and split it into two simply because you know who was involved in the group. At least not for the master database.
you've got to be kidding me.
ken has given us this fantastic credtied as feature and you don't think we should use it bevause there's a "&" in between the alias names.
what if the credit was "Quentin Tarantino & Uma Thurman"
I bet you would separate them then.
what's the difference. Not kidding, just giving my opinion. Not saying that I'm right or wrong. The difference (as I see it anyway) is it is not "Quentin Tarantino & Uma Thurman". It is one entity, Q&U so one credit. How I would do it if it were something else doesn't matter, since it is not something else (Now I'm sounding like Unicus ) For what it's worth the poll seems to agree with me (at least for Tenacious D). Not a unanimous decision but right now running close to 3-1 in favor of what I've said. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 3,480 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote:
Stuart:
No he's not kidding you and neither am I, do you see ONE credit ON Screen or TWO, on a BAD night I might see TWO. But there is ONLY one, this one becomes a LOCAL issue.
Skip I see two in Q&U. But we just had a margarita lunch here at work, so that could be it.  | | | ...James
"People fake a lot of human interactions, but I feel like I fake them all, and I fake them very well. That’s my burden, I guess." ~ Dexter Morgan |
|
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 5,459 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Italo Disco: Quote:
Same question, different example: On Kill Bill 2 the credits show that the character "The Bride" was originally created by Q&U. Quentin Tarantino and Uma Thurman in this case. I would opt to include both full names under "Original Characters By" and use "Q&U" in the "Credited As" field. I'd have gone for two credits too. Quentin Tarantino credited as "Q", Uma Thurman credited as "U". I would never have considered putting it as one credit. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 519 |
| | Posted: | | | | "&" is a substitute for "and". Therefore "Q&U" is equivelant to "Q and U" which is 2 credits. Simple.
Or now do we combine 2 names into 1 when "&" or "and" appear between them. | | | | Stuart | | | | Last edited: by Gadgeteer |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 519 |
| | Posted: | | | | I've started a new topic on Q&U HERE | | | | Stuart |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 2,372 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Gadgeteer: Quote:
I've started a new topic on Q&U HERE Seems like the logical thing to do  Hopefully a consensus can be reached. Either way, it's not that big of a deal. There aren't many credits like this....are there  |
|