| Author |
Message |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 3,436 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote:
Achim:
But do we list Main Feature and Commentary in the Disc ID description, I haven't seen it...by anyone.
Skip  Exactly Squirrel.God's and my point. | | | Achim [諾亞信； Ya-Shin//Nuo], a German in Taiwan.
Registered: May 29, 2000 (at InterVocative) |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 |  Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | I am just trying to follow the logic of thispoll and undferstand what is being asked.
Then however I voted, it was right.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 |  Posts: 775 |
| | Posted: | | | | You might want to read the first post then. I'm not saying this to criticise - normally I am, but this time I'm just explaining - but I phrased it precisely so that the likes of yourself and Rifter had no wiggle room for your trend of twisting the topic and turning it tangential, but you managed it all the same. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | I think I get it nadja.
I would say, unlike the old system where we had a limited amount of space to deal withsometimes describing what was on BOTH sides, we now have a larger field and the sides are now segregated, each with its own descriptor, it seems common sense to make use of it, the best way we can.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 793 |
| | Posted: | | | | Rules for TV series state for Disc IDs:
Label each of the discs containing episodes of the series. If there is a separate disc of extras with no episodes, use the standard "Bonus Materials" description.
That's new isn't it?
I think that clears it up! |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 17,334 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Squirrel.God: Quote:
Rules for TV series state for Disc IDs:
Label each of the discs containing episodes of the series. If there is a separate disc of extras with no episodes, use the standard "Bonus Materials" description.
That's new isn't it?
I think that clears it up! Nope... not new... been there the whole time. | | | | Pete |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 793 |
| | Posted: | | | | Oh. Never noticed it before! Well I think it makes it pretty clear that we shouldn't be using "& Bonus Materials" anyway  |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 17,334 |
| | Posted: | | | | I always thought so... between that and the rule about only using 1 description per disc in the main rules. | | | | Pete |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 6,635 |
| | Posted: | | | | You forgot to add a poll choice of "Don't Care"
Or for John: "Couldn't Care Less" | | | | Hal |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 775 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote:
I think I get it nadja.
I would say, unlike the old system where we had a limited amount of space to deal withsometimes describing what was on BOTH sides, we now have a larger field and the sides are now segregated, each with its own descriptor, it seems common sense to make use of it, the best way we can.
Skip Not at all. There was more than adequate space for both options in the old system. |
|