|
|
Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum
rules before posting.
Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free
registration is required.
If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.
|
|
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1... 13 14 15 16 17 ...31 Previous Next
|
The Birds |
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 813 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting kahless: Quote: <intermission:> Am I the only one here who receives the impression, that all discussions concerning the rules end in an pub brawl? Is that really necessary? </intermission:> No, not all, just those where the majority of the forum community disagrees with Skip and he won't let it go... ah, yes, you're right... all discussions. | | | Andy
"Credited as" Names Database |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting djskyler: Quote: Quoting skipnet50:
Quote: James Bond 04 is not useful to most users, they would be looking for Thunderball That's right, same as looking for "The Birds" and not "Alfred Hitchcock's The Birds"
Quoting Lopek
Quote: ...are we agreed that it is "The Birds"? Looks like there is a majority agreement in this thread toward that end. The submission was withdrawn anyway, wasn't it? (don't own that one) Nice try since this point was not about Title but Sort, dj. You can still sort The Birds, LOCALLY, James Bond 04 has NOTHING to do with TITLE. mdnitoil see my comment above. I presume you do KNOW how to set your sort...YES. @kahless: i agree, sadly we have a number of people who simply refuse to get it, and others who....well I don't want to conitinue. Oh well, it's all essentially irrelevant to me anyway since I am no longer Contributing. But the behavior around here leaves a lot to be desired. Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,459 |
| Posted: | | | | It certainly sounds like possessive titles need special mentioning in the rules. I myself changed "The Thing" to "John Carpenter's The Thing" a while ago, but now after reading all those possessive credit articles (nice research btw) I'm not sure I made the right decision. The problem is, I can't for the life of me think of a way of dealing with them that won't also exclude things like "Lemony Snicket's ...", "Frank Miller's" or "Bram Stoker's ..." which in my opinion are valid title possessives. And as for all this bitching and sniping, I initially voted against moderators, but the sooner they get here the better! |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 1,777 |
| Posted: | | | | Quote: mdnitoil see my comment above. I presume you do KNOW how to set your sort...YES. Yes, I know how to set my sort, thanks for asking though. To put it differently, a movie store could sort all of Alfred Hitchock's films under "A". They could also do the same with, well, whatever other films they might have. How many people are going to be able to actually find the films they're shopping for? I wonder how long this store will stay in business? Every now and then, you just have to step back and ask yourself, "Does this even make sense?" Obviously this question wasn't properly asked for this profile, or if it was, folks got so wrapped in the minutia of the decision, they never looked at the big picture. Just out of curiousity skip, now armed with this new information regarding how Hitchcock credited his films, have you renamed all your Hitchcock films locally? For that matter, has anybody out there felt compelled to rename all their Hitchcock films locally to "Alfred Hitchcock's....?" I know, skip and others will tell me what people do locally has no bearing on what goes into the online. But if absolutely nobody will commit to this possessive rule across the board locally, why would we force the online to do it? It doesn't make any sense. | | | Last edited: by mdnitoil |
| Registered: March 17, 2007 | Posts: 125 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting mdnitoil: Quote: skip...have you renamed all your Hitchcock films locally? Just click on Skip's huge collection and you can see he sorted it under "Birds." |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 813 |
| Posted: | | | | Ah, so this is one of those where he says the opposite of what he thinks to prove that everyone disagrees with him things. | | | Andy
"Credited as" Names Database | | | Last edited: by Lopek |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting djskyler: Quote: Quoting mdnitoil:
Quote: skip...have you renamed all your Hitchcock films locally?
Just click on Skip's huge collection and you can see he sorted it under "Birds." LOL, I don't consider my collection huge, I have moire books than I do DVDs. But therealso many users with B IGGER collections than mine. Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,459 |
| Posted: | | | | I've just been having another look at this profile, and I'm wondering if maybe whoever suggested that this is a modified title way back in the thread somewhere is right?
While I'm in definite agreement that the title of the film is "The Birds", the "Alfred Hitchcock's" on the DVD cover is very dominant, so I'm starting to wonder if the modified title rule should be applied in this case?
As I don't have this version, I can't check the cover, spine etc. personally, but I think whoever suggested that it's a modified title could be right! |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | I still think that is a fine answer, north.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | Posts: 374 |
| Posted: | | | | I think this does not bring us anywhere.
Who is there to decide when a possessive is dominant enough to qualify ?
KISS (Keep it simple and stupid), therefore it is 'The Birds'. |
| Registered: March 17, 2007 | Posts: 125 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting northbloke: Quote: While I'm in definite agreement that the title of the film is "The Birds", the "Alfred Hitchcock's" on the DVD cover is very dominant, so I'm starting to wonder if the modified title rule should be applied in this case? Yes, but you're saying to modify the title based on how the cover affected you. I think a more logical argument would be for you to say the cover persuaded you that the actual title is "Alfred Hitchcock's The Birds." |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 17,334 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting northbloke: Quote: I've just been having another look at this profile, and I'm wondering if maybe whoever suggested that this is a modified title way back in the thread somewhere is right?
While I'm in definite agreement that the title of the film is "The Birds", the "Alfred Hitchcock's" on the DVD cover is very dominant, so I'm starting to wonder if the modified title rule should be applied in this case?
As I don't have this version, I can't check the cover, spine etc. personally, but I think whoever suggested that it's a modified title could be right! I believe this is true for ANY DVD that the cover don't match the credits. the Modified Title Rule Says... Quote: The Original Title field will contain the original theatrical title, while the Title field will contain the title of the DVD release. For instance, for the Special Edition rerelease of There's Something About Mary:
* Title: There's Something More About Mary * Original Title: There's Something About Mary ] Says right there where I put in bold. and then gives an example of one with the special edition rerelease of There's Something about Mary. And before anyone says differently... there is nothing there that says it is only for special editions... just that that the title on a dvd release is different then on the original theatrical title. I personally always prefer the possessive to be in the title. | | | Pete |
| | johnd | Evening, poetry lovers. |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 298 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote: Rick:
I exoect nothing from someone with the intelligence level of a gnat, such as yoursalef. You behave and act like a total idiot. Your post was not a surprise. The others who chose to comment, well they to are expected, particularly the resident amoeba televel. As for johnd you don't get it and never will so give up.
Skip Well, Skip once more resorts to his usual rude, bullying tactics. Can you not understand that your interactions with this community are unacceptable and show a distinct lack of social skills? I know you have previously stated that you don't care that you do not have these skills. Fine. If this is the case, stop posting here. If you leave this forum, a number of long-time DVDProfiler contributors will return. You are the only one that is keeping them away at the moment. Their input will be of much higher value than yours. |
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | Posts: 374 |
| Posted: | | | | Since this is about DVD's, how many DVD online sellers actually sell 'Alfred Hitchcock's The Birds'? |
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,459 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting djskyler: Quote: Quoting northbloke:
Quote: While I'm in definite agreement that the title of the film is "The Birds", the "Alfred Hitchcock's" on the DVD cover is very dominant, so I'm starting to wonder if the modified title rule should be applied in this case?
Yes, but you're saying to modify the title based on how the cover affected you. I think a more logical argument would be for you to say the cover persuaded you that the actual title is "Alfred Hitchcock's The Birds." Unless I've misunderstood you, that's not what I'm saying at all - I'm saying that we follow the modified title rule. ie. The DVD title is "AH's The Birds", and the original title is "The Birds". As I said, I don't have this DVD, so I can't say either way. What I'm asking is for people who actually own the disc to look at the cover and make a reasoned opinion as to whether they feel if the AH bit is part of the title or not. Based on the front cover it certainly looks big enough and it's written just above and in the same font as the title. They're obviously meant to be linked, but is it enough to persuade you that the DVD distributor intended it to be the title or not? Remember, we're not talking about the FILM TITLE here, but purely the DVD TITLE. |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,372 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote: Rick:
I exoect nothing from someone with the intelligence level of a gnat, such as yoursalef. Classic. Insult someone's intelligence and spell 13% of the words wrong Personally I like what Dan said those many pages ago. Something about the title being found "in quotes" as in "Bram Stroker's Dracula" Seems easy enough to me. | | | Last edited: by lyonsden5 |
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1... 13 14 15 16 17 ...31 Previous Next
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|