Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum rules before posting.

Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free registration is required.

If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.

    Invelos Forums->General: General Home Theater Discussion Page: 1... 118 119 120 121 122 ...168  Previous   Next
HD DVD and Blu-ray
Author Message
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantMark Harrison
I like IMDB
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Great Rating
United States Posts: 3,321
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I think I have to go with northbloke on this one.  I think The Matrix was the right movie at the right time and the hardware market was also in the right place.  It kind of started an avalanche.

Those are some big titles, but I don't think the hardware prices are at that tipping point just yet where HD will take off like wildfire.  I think they'll generate some sales, maybe even a lot, but not enough to get really shake things up.
Get the CSVExport and Database Query plug-ins here.
Create fake parent profiles to organize your collection.
DVD Profiler Unlimited Registrantgraymadder
Registered: March 13, 2007
United States Posts: 103
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting twojayz:
Quote:


The questions are this:

How will any of these single titles impact the war and what will the impact be collectively?

Hardware sales for HD players (stand alone) are expected to top the 400,000 mark through the holiday season. Will these three titles impact player sales?

I look forward to the replies, mostly...


I don't think any titles currently released or furture releases will impact the war alll that much. Maybe if Star Wars were to be released then maybe.

Hardware sales will be much more of factor than software. I really don't think many consumers will quite have all the facts of which titles are supported by which format so the cost of the players will be much more relative. So the influx of players purchased will more than likely impact sales of a given format.

The bigger question is how will the PS3 sales this holiday affect the formats. I dont' really think stand-alone blu-ray players are at the price point to do any damage where as HD-DVD players are. I think if I were to buy an entry level blu-ray player it would be a better bet to buy a PS3. So if retailers are smart they could do this. In other words low end blu-ray players shouldn't sell all that well with the shift going to the PS3.

After the holiday season the sale of HD-DVD discs should come much closer to blu-ray discs if the above holds true.
 Last edited: by graymadder
DVD Profiler Unlimited Registrantgraymadder
Registered: March 13, 2007
United States Posts: 103
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Mark Harrison:
Quote:
I'd like to go back to the average PQ/AQ scores for a minute.  I was curious to compare the production years on the releases.  After all, it stands to reason that newer material has a better chance of blowing away a reviewer than older material.  Good reviewers should take the age of the film into account when reviewing, but I'm sure that doesn't always happen.

So I created two new databases (HD DVD & Blu-ray) and entered every R1 profile.  I didn't do any type of filtering for duplicates (and there are duplicate profiles out there) or anything else.  I just took the easy way out and grabbed everything.  I ended up with 375 HD DVD profiles and 395 Blu-ray profiles.  Then I exported the production years to Excel and started playing.

First of all the difference between the two was much closer than I expected.  I would guess WB has a lot to do with that.  But there goes the theory that HD DVD appeals to the old crowd.  Still, there were differences.

              HD DVD              Blu-ray
1930's        1                      0
1940's        1                      0
1950's        6                      2
1960's        10                    7
1970's        17                    14
1980's        40                    35
1990's        67                    56
2000's      233                    281

Pre-2000's HD DVD has 142 vs. 114 Blu-ray.

The average production year for HD DVD is 1997.5 and for Blu-ray it's 1999.7.

So, there's a lot less difference than I expected.  Still, there is a difference and it might have some bearing on the minute differences in PQ/AQ.

I guess the point is, those's numbers look good for the Blu-ray side, but in the end, they're basically useless as raw values like that.  There's just not enough context around them to give them any real meaning.


I quoted your post, but it this goes out to all the picture and sound quality posts.

The only numbers that matter and that are relative are the ones that the compare the same movie on both formats.  At least that's my thought.

Unfortunately WB is pretty much the only dual format supporter and then you have to go off their quality of standards.
 Last edited: by graymadder
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantAscended_Saiyan
A Blu-ray crack fiend
Registered: March 13, 2007
Posts: 1,127
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Mark Harrison:
Quote:
I'd like to go back to the average PQ/AQ scores for a minute.  I was curious to compare the production years on the releases.  After all, it stands to reason that newer material has a better chance of blowing away a reviewer than older material.  Good reviewers should take the age of the film into account when reviewing, but I'm sure that doesn't always happen.

So I created two new databases (HD DVD & Blu-ray) and entered every R1 profile.  I didn't do any type of filtering for duplicates (and there are duplicate profiles out there) or anything else.  I just took the easy way out and grabbed everything.  I ended up with 375 HD DVD profiles and 395 Blu-ray profiles.  Then I exported the production years to Excel and started playing.

First of all the difference between the two was much closer than I expected.  I would guess WB has a lot to do with that.  But there goes the theory that HD DVD appeals to the old crowd.  Still, there were differences.

              HD DVD              Blu-ray
1930's        1                      0
1940's        1                      0
1950's        6                      2
1960's        10                    7
1970's        17                    14
1980's        40                    35
1990's        67                    56
2000's      233                    281

Pre-2000's HD DVD has 142 vs. 114 Blu-ray.

The average production year for HD DVD is 1997.5 and for Blu-ray it's 1999.7.

So, there's a lot less difference than I expected.  Still, there is a difference and it might have some bearing on the minute differences in PQ/AQ.

I guess the point is, those's numbers look good for the Blu-ray side, but in the end, they're basically useless as raw values like that.  There's just not enough context around them to give them any real meaning.

I'm SOOO glad we numbers to work with here!  NOW, we are going somewhere!  Good job, Mark!  NOW all we need to do is get the PQ/SQ rating for the older titles!  If the older titles have great PQ ratings (like Casablanca), it would not help your theory at all.  Remember, a lot of the older B&W films were shot on 35mm and even 70mm film!  B&W pictures do not really degrade when compared to color pictures/films.  The SQ rating would probably be rated lower for those older titles. 

Would you like to take on that task as well, or would you like me to do it?
To err is human...
-----------
473 Blu-ray Titles
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantAscended_Saiyan
A Blu-ray crack fiend
Registered: March 13, 2007
Posts: 1,127
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting graymadder:
Quote:
I quoted your post, but it this goes out to all the picture and sound quality posts.

The only numbers that matter and that are relative are the ones that the compare the same movie on both formats.  At least that's my thought.

If different video and audio encodes were done for the same titles, I would completely agree with you.  But, when you use the exact same encode for BOTH formats on titles, there can be no difference (unless your play is messed up).  For Warner Bros, the video will ALWAYS be exactly the same for both formats (lowest common denominator encodes).  Every once and a while Warner will throw Blu-ray a LPCM track (even though they know it can fit on Blu-ray EVERY time).
To err is human...
-----------
473 Blu-ray Titles
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorTheMadMartian
Alien with an attitude
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 13,201
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote



No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever.
There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom.
Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand.
The Centauri learned this lesson once.
We will teach it to them again.
Though it take a thousand years, we will be free.
- Citizen G'Kar
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantVibroCount
The Truth is Silly Putty
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United States Posts: 5,635
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting graymadder:
Quote:
The only numbers that matter and that are relative are the ones that the compare the same movie on both formats.  At least that's my thought.


There are at least one of us who stand away from HD formats until the older films are well represented in any format. No film prior to the 1930s, one each from the first two decades listed, and only eight discs in the decade prior to 1960 (who knows how many duplicates there are in the 1950s).

I like older films. I await a reason to enter this format. I bought my first non-3/4" U-matic VCR when the guy offered me a copy of "Citizen Kane" as an incentive.

BTW, is "...Kane" out in either HD format yet? I mean, it's only considered in most polls as the greatest film ever made...
If it wasn't for bad taste, I wouldn't have no taste at all.

Cliff
 Last edited: by VibroCount
DVD Profiler Unlimited Registranttwojayz
Registered: September 7, 2007
United States Posts: 265
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I hate numbers but am relatively, sort of, almost kind of happy about using them here. Numbers don't lie, do they? Wait, yes they do....1.02 is a wide margin compared to 1.00...Nevermind, that is interpretation of the numbers, not the numbers themselves. 

It's hard to disagree with the idea that hardware sales will lead to software purchases. I don't know if the three releases alone will convince anyone to buy a player but I dont think it hurts that the HD camp has them leading up to the holidays, and spread through the entire quarter for that matter. Transformers in October, Shrek in November and Bourne in December. The timing coudn't be better. The same is said for the third gen players debuting in a couple weeks. Entry level players will be $299 with second gens available for even less than that. It's either one hell of a coincidence or a giant middle finger aimed straight at the BDA. I have to think that they know what they're doing it's more the latter. It's a ballsy move that might just work.
 Last edited: by twojayz
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantMark Harrison
I like IMDB
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Great Rating
United States Posts: 3,321
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting graymadder:
Quote:
The only numbers that matter and that are relative are the ones that the compare the same movie on both formats.  At least that's my thought.


Remember, my post was in response to the one comparing the average PQ/AQ scores given by review sites.  I could be wrong, but I don't believe those numbers represent dual-format releases, but all reviews.  Thus my numbers represent the same thing.
Get the CSVExport and Database Query plug-ins here.
Create fake parent profiles to organize your collection.
DVD Profiler Unlimited Registranttwojayz
Registered: September 7, 2007
United States Posts: 265
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Mark, you are correct about my post. That was a generalized average scoring of all releases. However, I did previously point out 9 or 10 dual format titles that had direct comparisons. In those particular cases the results were basically the same. There were 2 (I think) that gave the HD DVD version a slight edge, not including I think 300 which also gave HD DVD a nod for the extras which were not available to the BD version because of hardware restrictions...
DVD Profiler Unlimited Registranttwojayz
Registered: September 7, 2007
United States Posts: 265
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I just realized something; we're having a civilized discussion. Anyone see the flying pigs? 
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantVibroCount
The Truth is Silly Putty
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United States Posts: 5,635
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote


Not quite in the air yet... almost.
If it wasn't for bad taste, I wouldn't have no taste at all.

Cliff
DVD Profiler Unlimited Registranttwojayz
Registered: September 7, 2007
United States Posts: 265
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Ok, I actually laughed out loud when I saw that! Good one. 
DVD Profiler Unlimited Registranttwojayz
Registered: September 7, 2007
United States Posts: 265
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Found this on Yahoo! and thought I'd share. It's a couple weeks old but interesting anyway if you haven't seen it...the full article is here: http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/070905/new135.html?.v=8


"Warner is excited to offer consumers who purchase the new Toshiba HD DVD players the opportunity to own '300'," said Dorinda Marticorena, SVP Worldwide High Definition Media, Warner Home Video. "Not only is it the best selling HD DVD title to date, but it is also one of the most advanced titles with regard to new and innovative Hi Def features, both on the disc itself and through web connectivity. We believe that with the initial sales of "300", and this promotion, more than a half million consumers will own "300" on HD DVD by the end of this year."

Momentum For HD DVD Continues to Grow

This fall, with the availability of Toshiba's third generation players, and a significant increase in the rollout of HD DVD movie titles -- expected to increase from 300 to 1,000 titles by the end of the year -- momentum for HD DVD is undeniable. "With the recent announcement by Paramount and DreamWorks Animation SKG to exclusively support HD DVD, in addition to studio support from Universal and Warner, New Line Cinema and HBO, consumers now have even greater reason to supplement their HDTV purchase with a high def HD DVD movie experience," said Yoshi Uchiyama, Group Vice President, Toshiba America Digital A/V Group. "New players, new promotions, new movie titles and new studio partners are all evidence that HD DVD is delivering the ultimate high definition experience to the broader consumer market."
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantAscended_Saiyan
A Blu-ray crack fiend
Registered: March 13, 2007
Posts: 1,127
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
OK.  Here is what I found out only using HighDefDigest.com.

First, I only count the 1930 - 1980s movies reviewed on HD DVD so far, since they are usually considered old movies with dated elements.  Titles that have been released on both formats were NOT counted for obvious reasons.

I found the following:

1980s HD DVD exclusive reviewed titles - 12    Average PQ - 3.3 (3.29)  SQ - 3 (2.91)
1970s HD DVD exclusive reviewed titles - 4      Average PQ - 3.75          SQ - 2.75
1960s HD DVD exclusive reviewed titles - 2      Average PQ - 4.25          SQ - 4
1950s HD DVD exclusive reviewed titles - 3      Average PQ - 4              SQ - 2.83
1940s HD DVD exclusive reviewed titles - 1                  PQ - 5              SQ - 3.5
1930s HD DVD exclusive reviewed titles - 1                  PQ - 4.5            SQ - 3

Total Exclusive Reviewed Titles: 23    Total Average PQ - 3.67      Total Average SQ - 3

Only a hand full of titles were NOT DD+ 5.1.

This almost makes it same like the older the titles the better the PQ is!  ALL of 1930 - 1970s the titles (except Smokey and the Bandit) are from Warner Bros.  That means they should come to Blu-ray as well.  That will help push the PQ rating even higher.

On the other hand, the SQ for HD DVD from the 1930s - 1970s is a decent amount below their average.  It seems the 1980s SQ hurt HD DVD more than the 1930s - 1970s SQ.  The same seems to hold true for the PQ as well.  Lower PQ and SQ scores seem to be linked more so to Universal than to older titles in general.
To err is human...
-----------
473 Blu-ray Titles
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantAscended_Saiyan
A Blu-ray crack fiend
Registered: March 13, 2007
Posts: 1,127
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting twojayz:
Quote:
Found this on Yahoo! and thought I'd share. It's a couple weeks old but interesting anyway if you haven't seen it...the full article is here: http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/070905/new135.html?.v=8


"Warner is excited to offer consumers who purchase the new Toshiba HD DVD players the opportunity to own '300'," said Dorinda Marticorena, SVP Worldwide High Definition Media, Warner Home Video. "Not only is it the best selling HD DVD title to date, but it is also one of the most advanced titles with regard to new and innovative Hi Def features, both on the disc itself and through web connectivity. We believe that with the initial sales of "300", and this promotion, more than a half million consumers will own "300" on HD DVD by the end of this year."

Momentum For HD DVD Continues to Grow

This fall, with the availability of Toshiba's third generation players, and a significant increase in the rollout of HD DVD movie titles -- expected to increase from 300 to 1,000 titles by the end of the year -- momentum for HD DVD is undeniable. "With the recent announcement by Paramount and DreamWorks Animation SKG to exclusively support HD DVD, in addition to studio support from Universal and Warner, New Line Cinema and HBO, consumers now have even greater reason to supplement their HDTV purchase with a high def HD DVD movie experience," said Yoshi Uchiyama, Group Vice President, Toshiba America Digital A/V Group. "New players, new promotions, new movie titles and new studio partners are all evidence that HD DVD is delivering the ultimate high definition experience to the broader consumer market."

Two things...

1. They are really hoping for a huge surge in HD DVD owners to hope for over 500,000 units of "300" to be sold.  "300" on HD DVD hasn't crossed 150,000 units, last I checked.  That would have to mean that it's not just previous HD DVD owners buying the next-gen HD DVD players this time.  It would be interesting to see.

2. HD DVD titles are expected to go from 300 to 1,000 by the end of the year?  I thought Universal said they will have 125 titles release in the 4th quarter.  That adds up to 425 titles by the end of the year.  That would mean Paramount and Warner needs have to come up with 575 titles in the 4th quarter.  Do people think that will be true?  I'm just saying...



Blu-ray to get Rush Hour 3, Dec. 26...HD DVD to follow sometime in 2008 due to no region encoding.

Quote:
New Line is apparently planning a next gen release for 'Rush Hour 3,' with the Blu-ray expected just after Christmas, and the HD DVD to follow sometime in 2008.

Although it was critically reviled, the third film in the Jackie Chan-Chris Tucker franchise has grossed $133 million in the five weeks since its theatrical release in early August.

Now, according to information published by Home Media Magazine, New Line is planning a next-gen release for the film, with the Blu-ray edition hitting stores on December 26, day-and-date with the standard-def DVD (a rare Wednesday street date).


This seems like this might happen for ALL day & date releases from New Line.
To err is human...
-----------
473 Blu-ray Titles
    Invelos Forums->General: General Home Theater Discussion Page: 1... 118 119 120 121 122 ...168  Previous   Next