| Author |
Message |
| Registered: May 16, 2010 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 516 |
| | Posted: | | | | How shall a newcomer understand this BY's system when nothing is in correct here.
1. Put Hans Zimmer, Composer to the INVALID BY list, he come's over and over again with his accepted BY that should not be used, this is nerving -> http://www.invelos.com/Forums.aspx?task=viewtopic&topicID=611900&PageNum=4&messageID=2110123#M2110123
2. Keep order in the INVALID BY list, it has always the same size also a lot should also be there. Who does maintain this? For me in the future: When a BY is accepted and not on the INVALID BY list then I will use it in the future. When it is approved it is ok without doing a lot of research, for this we have the INVALID BY list and that is all what is needed.
3. I have 5 contributions with a not accepted BY but as clear as the amen in the church. They date from April 26th. Over 3 weeks, nearly 4. What are they doing with this? To accept a BY when it is good documented takes 10 to 15 minutes, but not a month. Also others make on the same profiles contributions in the meantime, all will be lost when after a month it is accepted. So, to accept a BY should really not take more than a week in the feature, all longer is nerving and does not help to work correct.
Thanks,
Fritz | | | *
3D TV Panasonic TX-P65VT30J + Blu-ray Player Panasonic DMP-BDT500
My Filmcollection online: www.filmkino.ch
* | | | | Last edited: by SwissFilm |
|
| Registered: June 26, 2013 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 694 |
| |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 20,111 |
| | Posted: | | | | +1
...yeah, I don't know why it often takes so long to "review" a well-documented new BY contribution. I have a pending new BY addition dating from May 7th.
It would also be good if the official "Valid" forum BY thread was updated more on the main page. There's a ton of valid documented/approved BY's in that thread that are sometimes difficult to locate on the exact page (to document in contributions) otherwise. | | | | Corey |
|
| Registered: June 12, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 2,665 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Katatonia: Quote:
...yeah, I don't know why it often takes so long to "review" a well-documented new BY contribution. I have a pending new BY addition dating from May 7th. I have one from April 27th (this calendar year)  | | | | Bad movie? You're soaking in it! |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 20,111 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting tweeter: Quote:
I have one from April 27th (this calendar year) swissfilm has you beat by a day.  I just really meant that it almost always takes an awful long time to get them "reviewed" — which really shouldn't take more time than getting a normal contribution approved. Maybe it's just how Ken has the system set up in the queue, I don't know... but it certainly could stand improvement. | | | | Corey |
|
| Registered: May 16, 2010 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 516 |
| | Posted: | | | | For me the best and always updated approved BY list is the one from Luigi (thanks!): http://www.luigifilocamo.it/BY.htmlThey are all in there with the link to the appropriate entry in the forum. Fritz | | | *
3D TV Panasonic TX-P65VT30J + Blu-ray Player Panasonic DMP-BDT500
My Filmcollection online: www.filmkino.ch
* | | | | Last edited: by SwissFilm |
|
| Registered: September 3, 2007 |  Posts: 404 |
| | Posted: | | | | +1
I still got 1 that's in the reviewing state since Apr 21, 2014!
That's way too long to say if it's a correct BY or not. | | | | Mitch |
|
| Registered: May 26, 2007 | | Posts: 186 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting SwissFilm: Quote:
For me the best and always updated approved BY list is the one from Luigi (thanks!):
http://www.luigifilocamo.it/BY.html
They are all in there with the link to the appropriate entry in the forum.
Fritz Thanks a lot for the link. Didn't know that existed.  | | | | "The only way to get rid of a temptation is to yield to it. Resist it, and your soul grows sick with longing for the things it has forbidden to itself, with desire for what its monstrous laws have made monstrous and unlawful." |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 1,272 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting SwissFilm: Quote:
For me the best and always updated approved BY list is the one from Luigi (thanks!):
http://www.luigifilocamo.it/BY.html
They are all in there with the link to the appropriate entry in the forum.
Fritz You'd think Ken would have something like this built in instead of relying on someone doing it for him. Thanks for posting it, and thanks to Luigi for going out of his way. | | | HDTV: 52" Toshiba Regza 52XV545U AVR: Onkyo TR-707
Speakers: Paradigm Monitor 7 v6, CC-190 & Atom Monitors Subwoofer: Definitive Technology ProSub 800
BD/DVD: Oppo BDP-93 (Region Free) HD PVR: Motorola DXC3400 500GB w/ 1TB Expander
BD/DVD/Game: 250GB PS3 Slim DVD/Game: 250GB XBox 360 Elite Special Edition (Black) Game: Wii
Remote: Logitech Harmony One w/ PS3 Adapter WHS: Acer H341 Windows Home Server | | | | Last edited: by DoubleDownAgain |
|
| Registered: November 3, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 523 |
| | Posted: | | | | Dear Swissfilm,
your point about invalid BYs isn’t discussed up to now.
As far as i’m concerned, i cannot understand what it is good for, to declare an accepted BY as to be invalid.
As long as it is incorrect because the real Year is different -> okay, then it should be removed!
But just due to the reason, an accepted BY is as per rules not needed at this time, f.e. due to a different common name…
What is that good for to remove it?
Tomorrow, next month, or next year is coming up a new movie with new young stars…
And a BY declared as invalid needs to become valid again…
Who can now find the correct entry in forum what is valid?
Therefore all users, please stop all that threads with needless invalid BYs.
Concerning the Rules, they might be okay, but it doesn’t improve our database!
Another subject is ‘common names’.
Why isn’t it possible to make separation in the CLT to search within crew or cast only?
And in Crew with more options f.e. to search only in Sound and/or Art and so on...
It would make it much easier and the results would be less doubtful.
All readers -> think it over, please … | | | | Last edited: by LKanne |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 20,111 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting SwissFilm: Quote:
For me the best and always updated approved BY list is the one from Luigi (thanks!):
http://www.luigifilocamo.it/BY.html
They are all in there with the link to the appropriate entry in the forum.
Fritz Nice! I didn't even know that existed, thanks! | | | | Corey |
|
| Registered: November 3, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 523 |
| | Posted: | | | | by the way -> Luigi is better known in Forum by his user name: Kluge and does always have a link to his own BY list in any thread ... and he is always happy to get support to keep this list up to date... | | | | Last edited: by LKanne |
|
| Registered: August 4, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 2,441 |
| | Posted: | | | | I recommend that you always check the information from the list, I am human and can make mistakes :-)
And please notify any errors when you find them. | | | | Updated List of Accepted Birth Years |
|
| Registered: May 29, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 1,212 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Kluge: Quote:
I recommend that you always check the information from the list, I am human and can make mistakes :-)
And please notify any errors when you find them. Here are some errors that need correction /additions Namecorrections /wrong linksMichael Price (1922-2000) --> Michael Prince Michael Price (19??) --> Michael Prince Documentation: Page 139, Post 1
Brian Clark (1929) --> Bryan Clark Brian Clark (19??) --> Bryan Clark Documentation: Page 154, Post 8
Mike White (1936) Mike White (1954) ---> Michael White Mike White (1961) Mike White (1970) Documentation: Page 8, Post 16, Page 14, Post 15, Page 64, Post 2 and Page 164, Post 13 correctections must be (no links activated) Mike White (1936) Mike White (1961) Mike White (1970) Documentation: Page 8, Post 16, Page 14, Post 15 and Page 64, Post 2 Michael White (1933) Michael White (1936) Michael White (1954) Michael White (1962) Documentation: Page 31, Post 14, Page 44, Post 6 and Page 164, Post 13 Paul Newman (1925) Documentation: on Page 107 Post 2 Wrong Page : Brian Durkin Page 16 post 6 --> Page 160 post 6. Wrong Post : Goldie Page 142, Post 8 --> Page 142, Post 9 Not on listWilliam Hudson (1925) William Hudson (19??) Documentation: Page 37, Post 16
James Whitaker (1968) James Whitaker (1970) Documentation: Page 61, Post 10
Ben Johnson (1918) Ben Johnson (19??) Documentation: Page 26, Post 5
Chris Conrad (1970) Chris Conrad (19??) Documentation: Page 72, Post 2 confirmation of approval Daniel McDonald (1960-2007) Daniel McDonald (19??) Documentation: Page 148, Post 10
David Collins (1962) David Collins (19??) Documentation: Page 130, Post 5
Wrong linksPeter White (1937) Peter White (19??) Documentation: Page 139, Post 8
David Sullivan (1977) David Sullivan (19??) Documentation: Page 182, Post 8
Greetings, John | | | | Last edited: by JOHNNYV |
|
| Registered: August 4, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 2,441 |
| |
| Registered: May 29, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 1,212 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Kluge: Quote:
Thank you John, all fixed  My Pleasure. But Michael Price (1922-2000) --> Michael Prince and Brian Clark (1929) --> Bryan Clark has not yet been fixed. Links are correct but names incorrect. John | | | | Last edited: by JOHNNYV |
|