|
|
Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum
rules before posting.
Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free
registration is required.
If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.
|
|
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 2 3 Previous Next
|
Miniseries with undifferentiated credits |
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
Registered: December 10, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,004 |
| Posted: | | | | If a miniseries has undifferentiated credits, how should we handle it? This example that brought this up is Tin Man. Each episode has credits at the end, but they are credits for the whole series, not any particular segment. The credit are identical on every episode, even though a large number of the listed cast didn't appear on that episode. Should we just give one list of credits for the whole series or do episodic dividers, but list identical credits for each segment? | | | Last edited: by Ace_of_Sevens |
| Registered: March 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,851 |
| Posted: | | | | I would list the credits as they appear in the episodes.
Many TV episodes credit regular cast members who may not have appeared in that particular episode. We don't exclude them just because they're not present. However, it would be nice if we could flag them as "not present".
--------------- |
| Registered: December 10, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,004 |
| Posted: | | | | I lean toward not listing them. I don't think this is equivalent to TV shows where only some regular cast members appear in a given episode. In that case, we need to have separate credits for each episode anyway because only the main opening credits are identical.We still need to list guest stars and stuff. In this case, the credits are completely identical between all episodes of the miniseries. I am against adding data that doesn't actually tell you anything useful because it's needless complexity. Having one set of credits for the entire miniseries gives you the same information as having the same credits repeated three times and is easier to understand. |
| Registered: December 10, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,004 |
| Posted: | | | | I should add that hypothetically, if we did have a not-present flag, I would support separate credits, because then the credits as-entered would have meaningfully differentiated data. As the program stands today, I see no point. |
| Registered: March 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,851 |
| Posted: | | | | Entering credits in the standard way is avoiding "needless complexity". In fact, your urge to do things differently has led to the complexity of this conversation.
--------------- |
| Registered: June 12, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,665 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting scotthm: Quote: Entering credits in the standard way is avoiding "needless complexity". If something non-standard is done someone will come back and fix it, and be justified in doing it. Best option is to just repeat the credits for each episode. The upside is if episodes are the same credit-wise they should be easy to enter. Enter once then Paste Append, repeat. Credits counts and the CLT are not impacted and it reduces confusion. | | | Bad movie? You're soaking in it! |
| Registered: December 10, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,004 |
| Posted: | | | | I think saying one set of credits is non-standard is begging the question. This assume that miniseries are the same as regular TV series, which I don't think has been established. I'd say they should be treated like regular TV series if they have differentiated credits and like movies if they don't since the need to handle episodic credits is the main reason for differentiating TV series in the rules. |
| Registered: October 30, 2011 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,870 |
| Posted: | | | | Ace,
However the contribution in question is making a correction based on the rules which seem pretty cleaar to me unless I am interpreting them wrong.
Complete Series/Season & Anthologies of Episodes: Enter Cast and Crew for each episode using standard rules, and insert dividers to separate each episode's credit list from the others. Do not list Cast and Crew outside of the dividers even if they are credited in all episodes
The way I read this, not having the dividers is incorrect and against the rules. Especially since each episode has end credits.
Now I can see why one might think it's "pointless", but in my opinion that is what the rules require. | | | Last edited: by Scooter1836 |
| Registered: December 10, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,004 |
| Posted: | | | | My claim is that a miniseries, at least in this case, isn't a TV series: It's a TV movie that was too long to show on one night, so TV series rules don't apply. |
| Registered: October 30, 2011 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,870 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Ace_of_Sevens: Quote: My claim is that a miniseries, at least in this case, isn't a TV series: It's a TV movie that was too long to show on one night, so TV series rules don't apply. So what you are saying is we should all go and in every TV mini series take out the episdode dividers because "It's a TV movie that was too long to show on one night" like "Band of Brothers", "The Pacific", "Mildred Pierce" to just name a few. Or is it you just want an exception because this one happens to credit the same cast after each episode? The rule seems clear to me the way it is written and becuase of this section "Do not list Cast and Crew outside of the dividers even if they are credited in all episodes" they cannot be listed outide of dividers. Personally the way I read the rule it is clear that the dividers are a requirement. But I would think that if exceptions like this are made, maybe they should be posted in the "Contribution Rules Committee" forum and get the rule ammended/changed. But at least how I read the current rule set, the contribution enforces the current rule set and the previous way it was violated it. | | | Last edited: by Scooter1836 |
| Registered: March 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,851 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Ace_of_Sevens: Quote: My claim is that a miniseries, at least in this case, isn't a TV series: It's a TV movie that was too long to show on one night, so TV series rules don't apply. Are each of the three segments titled the same in the credits, or are there "episode" titles? If they have different titles then you need episode dividers. --------------- |
| Registered: December 10, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,004 |
| Posted: | | | | If the makers saw fit to treat them like an episodic TV series, I think we should treat them as such. (From a look through my collection, it looks like most series that air in a four-hour slot or less don't bother with separate credits and longer ones do, but this isn't universally true.) If they didn't, then we should treat them as a movie. There's no obvious reason miniseries should all be given the same treatment. This is the way things have usually been handled. Other examples in the DB that currently list only one set of credits include the US Blu-ray versions of 10.5 Apocalypse, The Final Days of Planet Earth and Jules Verne's Mysterious Island and the DVD versions of Alice in Wonderland, Cleopatra, Merlin, Noah's Ark, Arabian Nights, Jason and the Argonauts, The Lost Empire, Moby Dick and The Odyssey.
This isn't a case where there is a standard way of doing things and I'm saying we should ignore the standard or change it. The majority of cases seem to be done the way I'm advocating, though there are lots of exceptions. I'm saying that precedent leans my way and that this way makes more sense. If you want to list duplicate credits for everything, that's fine, but you're the one advocating a change in the standard way of doing things. |
| Registered: December 10, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,004 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting scotthm: Quote: Quoting Ace_of_Sevens:
Quote: My claim is that a miniseries, at least in this case, isn't a TV series: It's a TV movie that was too long to show on one night, so TV series rules don't apply. Are each of the three segments titled the same in the credits, or are there "episode" titles? If they have different titles then you need episode dividers.
--------------- None of the examples I listed have episode titles beyond "part 1" or something similar. If there were named episodes, I would be all for the dividers because they are adding meaningful data. |
| Registered: October 30, 2011 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,870 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting scotthm: Quote: Quoting Ace_of_Sevens:
Quote: My claim is that a miniseries, at least in this case, isn't a TV series: It's a TV movie that was too long to show on one night, so TV series rules don't apply. Are each of the three segments titled the same in the credits, or are there "episode" titles? If they have different titles then you need episode dividers.
--------------- The disc titles have the different parts broken out. The disc menu's have them broken out Each title sequence has "Tin Man" in the opening credit sequence. But that is the case of most mini-series. Most mini-series are not episodic in nature and those are profiled in this manner since they have end credits at the end of each part. |
| Registered: October 30, 2011 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,870 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Ace_of_Sevens: Quote:
This isn't a case where there is a standard way of doing things and I'm saying we should ignore the standard or change it. The majority of cases seem to be done the way I'm advocating, though there are lots of exceptions. I'm saying that precedent leans my way and that this way makes more sense. If you want to list duplicate credits for everything, that's fine, but you're the one advocating a change in the standard way of doing things. Ok I am cofused here First you say "This isn't a case where there is a standard way of doing things" and then you say "but you're the one advocating a change in the standard way of doing things". How can I advocate a change to a standard if this isn't a case where there is a standard way fo doing things. I read this rule: Complete Series/Season & Anthologies of Episodes: Enter Cast and Crew for each episode using standard rules, and insert dividers to separate each episode's credit list from the others. Do not list Cast and Crew outside of the dividers even if they are credited in all episodes And that did seem clear to me I also checked the thread "Collected Statements from Invelos on contribution discussions" and I saw nothing there to alter that. There is no clarifications at all on mini-series and whether or not they need to have episode titles between each separated part to be really considered a "mini series". But at the same time you are saying that even if they had no episode titles, but different credits they should be broken out like a min-series. That does not sound consistant to me considering what the rules state. | | | Last edited: by Scooter1836 |
| Registered: December 10, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,004 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Scooter1836: Quote:
Ok I am cofused here First you say "This isn't a case where there is a standard way of doing things" and then you say "but you're the one advocating a change in the standard way of doing things". How can I advocate a change to a standard if this isn't a case where there is a standard way fo doing things. What I meant to say is there is no clear standard in the rules, but precedent is on my side here. Quote:
I read this rule:
Complete Series/Season & Anthologies of Episodes: Enter Cast and Crew for each episode using standard rules, and insert dividers to separate each episode's credit list from the others. Do not list Cast and Crew outside of the dividers even if they are credited in all episodes
And that did seem clear to me
I also checked the thread "Collected Statements from Invelos on contribution discussions" and I saw nothing there to alter that.
There is no clarifications at all on mini-series and whether or not they need to have episode titles between each separated part to be really considered a "mini series". That would be clear, except those are rules for regular TV series, not miniseries. You are assuming that they apply to miniseries, but nothing actually says so. My contention is that with miniseries, there's a fine line with long TV movies on one end and a TV series with a short run on the other end. Treating all of them the same way will end up with suboptimal results. If the makers treat it like a movie with no episode names and only one set of credits (which they have to show every night because of union rules), then we should treat it like a movie. If they treat it like a TV series where episodes have individual name and/or credits, then we should treat it like a TV series. Yes, there's nothing in the rules that says this, but there's nothing that says otherwise, either. The rules are silent on how miniseries should be handled. I'm saying we should treat them like this because out of all the approaches that are consistent with the rules, it makes the most sense. Also, that's the way most series are currently entered. I'm unclear on your position. Are you saying miniseries should always have separate credits or only if there's no play-all option? |
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 2 3 Previous Next
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|