Author |
Message |
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 3,830 |
| Posted: | | | | issue: stunt and stunt double in cast section, allready declined two times. In the Shadows 2000 8-711983-452367 In The Shadows 2000 658149-797925 In the shadows 2001 5-706122-352816 In the Shadows 2001 057373-158432 In the Shadows 2001 057373-158432 In The Shadows 2001 5-050582-216356 In The Shadows 2001 5-050582-119459 In the shadows 2002 5-706102-352812 In the shadows 2002 5-706122-352816 Plot: A hit man is recruited to snuff out a veteran stuntman, but he falls in love with the stuntman's daughter and decides to become a stuntman himself. Contribution note: In The Shadows 8-711983-452367The stunt people and doubles are part of the cast: according the dvd and the credits on dvd: Running Time: 101 (Powerdvd) Audio Tracks: (Powerdvd) English Dolby Digital Stereo English Dolby Digital 5.1 CREW: Jonathan Miller: Supervising Sound Editor > Sound Designer CAST: Val Avery as Carlo Pierazzi (+) Duke Valenti as Biler > Biker George Kapetan as Trandlent > Transient Lance Gilbert as Stunt Double for Mr. Modine (+) Hugh Aodh O'Brien as Stunt Double for Mr. Caan (+) Tierre Turner as Stunt Double for Mr. Gooding, Jr. (+) Jay Amor as Stunt (+) Billy Bates as Stunt (+) Nick Brandon as Stunt (+) J. Michael Christopher as Stunt (+) Jim Churchman as Stunt (+) Sean Graham as Stunt (+) Artie Malesci as Stunt (+) Joseph Meduri as Stunt (+) Eric "ET" Miranda as Stunt (+) Steve Ritzi as Stunt (+) J. C. Robaina as Stunt (+) Michael Romain as Stunt (+) Reginald Stanley as Stunt (+) | | | Sources for one or more of the changes and/or additions were not submitted. Please include the sources for your changes in the contribution notes, especially for cast and crew additions. | | | Last edited: by ? |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Giga:
How many times do we have to go through this.
If you have Actor Actor Stunt Stunt Actor
Then you include the stunts.
Based on your screen shot, assuming that is the end of the credit list then you don't, it is very simple to sort out.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 3,830 |
| Posted: | | | | As you see by the poll this is not a clear cut case, there is a lot of confusion going on. Stunts have been mentioned in other threads, There is never been a clear answer to it. There is a clear divider between cast and crew: | | | Sources for one or more of the changes and/or additions were not submitted. Please include the sources for your changes in the contribution notes, especially for cast and crew additions. | | | Last edited: by ? |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 2,759 |
| Posted: | | | | There is some sort of consensus that stunt people credits which are fully integrated into the cast credits should be listed in profiler. IMO in this example the stunt credits are fully integrated into the cast credits even though they are at the end of the cast list.
Actor Actor
Stunt Stunt
would be different though. | | | Last edited: by RHo |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,293 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting RHo: Quote: There is some sort of consensus that stunt people credits which are fully integrated into the cast credits should be listed in profiler. IMO in this example the stunt credits are fully integrated into the cast credits even though they are at the end of the cast list.
Actor Actor
Stunt Stunt
would be different though. FWIW I would agree in this instance | | | It is dangerous to be right in matters where established men are wrong |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,436 |
| Posted: | | | | I agree with RHo and Voltaire53, that is how I always understood the "agreement" as well. | | | Achim [諾亞信; Ya-Shin//Nuo], a German in Taiwan. Registered: May 29, 2000 (at InterVocative) |
|
Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,730 |
| Posted: | | | | Agreed with RHo. | | | It all seems so stupid, it makes me want to give up! But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid?
Registrant since 05/22/2003 |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 17,804 |
| Posted: | | | | Agree in principle to skipnet50 and RHO! When embedded in the cast include, when separate don't include. But concernig this example I have a problem with the definition "fully integrated" though! | | | Thorsten | | | Last edited: by kahless |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 4,596 |
| Posted: | | | | I wouldn't include them as they are not imbedded in the cast list. | | | My WebGenDVD online Collection |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 3,830 |
| Posted: | | | | as I see it: the cast list stops with the last stunts, the crew list starts behind the cast list | | | Sources for one or more of the changes and/or additions were not submitted. Please include the sources for your changes in the contribution notes, especially for cast and crew additions. | | | Last edited: by ? |
|
| Corne | Registered: Nov. 1, 2000 |
Registered: April 5, 2007 | Posts: 1,059 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Giga Wizard: Quote: as I see it: the cast list stops with the last stunts, the crew list starts behind the cast list I agree | | | Cor |
|
Registered: June 12, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,665 |
| Posted: | | | | Were i updating (or voting) this cast list i'd stop with Thug #2.
The convention on handling this is straightforward and the Rules addition would be equally straightforward. | | | Bad movie? You're soaking in it! |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | This is what happens when we have 'user conventions' that haven't made it into the rules. Everybody has a different interpretation. Since I started this, with my 'Stripes' contribution way back when, I will add my interpretation...for whatever it is worth. I would not include these people. For me, the cast list ends with the last actor listed. If there are actors listed after the stunt people, then I include them. If there aren't, I don't. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,394 |
| Posted: | | | | Personally I agree with those who say to stop with Thug #2, though it could go either way depending on one's interpretation of "fully integrated into" the cast list. On one side is Skip's (and other's) interpretation that stunts have to be inserted between actors to be integrated. On another side's interpretation is that there be no separation (line) between actors and stunts.
I'm not sure which interpretation supports the original intent, but I tend to come down on the former mainly because I have no use for a list of stunt people I'm never going to track anyway. | | | Another Ken (not Ken Cole) Badges? We ain't got no badges. We don't need no badges. I don't have to show you any stinking badges. DVD Profiler user since June 15, 2001 | | | Last edited: by kdh1949 |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,635 |
| Posted: | | | | I agree with Unicus.
Since no "real" cast follow the stunt people, I would not include them.
My definition of "embedded" is that there are cast members both before and after.
That's not the case here. | | | Hal | | | Last edited: by hal9g |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 17,334 |
| Posted: | | | | I would have to agree with Unicus and Hal on this one | | | Pete |
|