This would indeed be helpful in preventing contributions pingponging back and forth. Not sure it would be easy to implement though.

Well, thats why I request some sort of verifier, so we don't have to go back and forth. In my opinion uncredited cast should not be submitted, since there's a reason they're not credited in the first place.
How do I verify and how did the submitters verify (from one of my dvds) Name: (blank) Role: (uncredited) But if I remove them, and it says in the previous contributionnotes that they have been verified from before, with links etc, I resubmit them in the cast. I have doubts with uncredited cast when the notes says only "New Contribution", without documentation of the cast I don't know if the database is the same as intervocative, or invelos is a total new database built from scratch. If so it's a new database, then I will leave uncredited cast in the cast section from now on, since the Invelos forbid thirdparty which was used at Intervocative. I did that, and all my contributions there was accepted.

You just write what I was about to write. If it's in the database left all the uncredited cast in the profile, you don't know if the previous contributors search them. I have made some submited profile with uncredited cast and real name in the past, but you can't see were I get my info since before we can't wrote nothing on a new contribution.

If you don't like it remove them from your personal database, this is not that hard to do...

No note can be write on a new contribution at first, so no documentation will be here. The only thing that we can read is "New Contribution" no more than this. Now it's a different story since we can leave note on a new contribution.

So you can't delete those informations, just delete them in your personal database if you don't like it.

Quoting skipnet50:

Quote:
You absolutely can and should be writing a note with a NEW Contribution and if you are adding (uncredited)  without adding the accompanying verification EVEN on a new release, then the ContrIBUTION SHOULd BE DECLINED

Correct!

Quote:
AND IF NOT THEN THE undocumented (uncredited) should be removed ASAP. PERIOD.

Ken has decided different!

I completly agree that a new contribution with no documentation should be decline now, since we must give it in the contribution note now.

But when the profiler was launch it was impossible to leave any note on a new contribution. That why I say that we can't remove them since they were approve like that by Ken.

Please Skip don't shout at me, I'm on your side with this 

Gard:

I haven't looked lately, but I thin the Intervocative data is still out there, you just have to still have your 2.4/2.5 Beta...which I do.

SKip

I have re-installing the 2.4 version on my computer this morning to verify this and yes the old contribution note are always online. So we have a way to check the uncredited cast entry, but I'm not sure if the big database file is always online since the file was already on my system.

But it's a temporary help, Ken will probably one day or another delete all this archive stuff, since the Intervocative version is not suported anymore.